return to Bible Probe
Visit the Message Board

Compiled by:
Steve Keohane, USN (Ret)


Some pictures below could make some people sick!

Abortion - Let Us Reason
(So many Americans are waiting to adopt them)
don't snuff out their tiny lives...they want to live


God will hold you individually accountable!


The Hand of Hope

During the surgery on little Samuel, the little guy reached his tiny but fully developed hand through the incision and firmly grasped the surgeon's finger.


The picture is that of a 21-week-old unborn baby named Samuel Alexander
Armas, who is being operated on by a surgeon named Joseph Bruner. The baby
was diagnosed with spina bifida and would not survive if removed from his
mother's womb. Little Samuel's mother, Julie Armas, is an obstetrics nurse in
Atlanta. She knew of Dr. Bruner's remarkable surgical procedure. Practicing
at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, he performs these
special operations while the baby is still in the womb.
 Michael Clancy, working for USA Today captured the surgery on film.

During the procedure, the doctor removes the uterus via C-section and makes a
small incision to operate on the baby. During the surgery on little Samuel,
the little guy reached his tiny but fully developed, hand through the
incision and firmly grasped the surgeon's finger. The photograph captures
this amazing event with perfect clarity.

The editors titled the picture, "Hand of Hope." The text explaining the
picture begins, "The tiny h
and of 21-week-old fetus Samuel Alexander Armas
emerges from the mother's uterus to grasp the finger of Dr. Joseph Bruner as
if thanking the doctor for the gift of life."

Little Samuel's mother said they "wept for days" when they saw the picture.
She said, "The photo reminds us my pregnancy isn't about disability or an illness, it's about a little person" "The Hand" of the fetus. You can see the actual picture, and it is awesome...incredible.

God made only mankind in his image. We are uniquely singled out bearing the image of God above any other creature. He is the sole object of Christ's redemptive love. Christ went to the trouble of dying for our transgressions against God by becoming a human first. He went through the process of being put in a womb and being there for 9 months like any other, then born under the human conditions (without sin). Certainly The preexistent Son of God was a person, and he was a person in the womb.

God said to Noah "Whoever sheds man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed; for God made man in his own image." (Gen. 9:6) God points out that man is unique he is worth more than animals.

On September 11th, 2001, Islamic terrorists killed 3000 innocent people who were peaceably trying to live their lives.  On that same day, 3500 sweet babies just like little Samuel died from abortion in America. This, all at a time when there are lines of people, all waiting to adopt these holy innocents.  Every day, over 3500 babies are murdered by abortion in the United States.  That's over 1.2 million abortions every year.



Jesus seems to have elevated "hurting a child" to an all new level ---of heinous crimes...

This molesting or murdering of children surely carries over to those who assist in hurting children; they can't escape the culpability. Like so-called "doctors", "nurses" and others involved in this wide scale abortion crime.  Speaking of hurting children, Jesus said,

Luke 17:1-2

Then said he unto the disciples, It is impossible but that offences will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come! It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.

Millstone picture

What can be a bigger offense to children that someone deliberately snuffing out their lives for personal gain?  A better job, a better car, or nicer house is no defense.  A doctor who does this is just as culpable.


The American Holocaust


Abortion Doctors have murdered over 52 million real American people (babies) since 1973    A great many of these infants had their fully developed skulls crushed by so-called "doctors"

Who in the 1950's or 1960's could have dreamed that the America we love would have made it an undeniable right (Law) that a woman could contract a so-called "doctor" to reach into her uterus with forceps and crush the head of a well-formed thinking and feeling baby, pull apart the baby's limbs with cold steel instruments and burn its small body with saline solution?



Abortion: Faces of Evil? 


December 2011: FACES OF EVIL? Two Maryland abortion doctors face murder charges

By the CNN Wire Staff Elkton, Maryland (CNN) -- Two Maryland doctors face murder charges related to abortions performed on late-term fetuses that were viable, authorities said Friday. Steven Brigham and Nicola Riley are in jails in New Jersey and Utah, respectively, awaiting extradition hearings to bring them back to Maryland, police in Elkton, Maryland, said in a news release. The two face identical charges -- five counts each of first-degree murder, five of second-degree murder and one of conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. Finish reading this at:  CNN


12-year-old steals day with pro-life speech (abortion)

Teachers threaten disqualification, but girl chooses to speak against abortion
Posted: February 16, 2009

By Chelsea Schilling
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Despite facing threats of disqualification, a 12-year-old girl took first place in a speech contest when she eloquently argued for the rights of unborn children – after an offended judge quit.

Click above picture to
See this brave little girl on You Tube

"What if I told you that right now, someone was choosing if you were going to live or die?" the seventh-grader begins in a video recording of her speech on YouTube. "What if I told you that this choice wasn't based on what you could or couldn't do, what you'd done in the past or what you would do in the future? And what if I told you, you could do nothing about it?"

The girl, a student at a Toronto school identified only as "Lia," continued:

"Fellow students and teachers, thousands of children are right now in that very situation. Someone is choosing without even knowing them whether they are going to live or die.

"That someone is their mother. And that choice is abortion."

But what made the 12-year-old choose to speak about abortion?

Finish reading this at: World Net Daily



This is not a broken doll.  This little boy was one of several third trimester BABIES found in medical waste bags outside a legal abortion center in Houston, Texas, in late 1986. He was 14 inches long, weighed 2 pounds 2 ounces, and was 30 weeks gestation....... 7 MONTHS OLD......when he was killed. This is a precious 4 1/2 month old little girl, burned by saline solution a "doctor" used to abort her. There are 4000 babies aborted each day in America (one every 20 seconds). Abortion is legal through all nine months of pregnancy.
This black BABY was aborted on May 11, 1987, at the Michigan Avenue Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois, by the "D&E" (dilation & evacuation) method. By this "procedure" the abortionist uses large forceps to crush the baby inside the mother's uterus and remove it in pieces.

The mothers of these babies above elected to torture and kill their own babies.

Premature babies do feel pain!  Don't listen to Planned Parenthood on this...

Premature babies 'feel true pain'
Premature babies experience feelings of pain rather than simply displaying reflex reactions, a study says.

Experts have never been sure how a premature baby responds to pain, the Journal of Neuroscience reported.

But a team from University College London found that they do feel pain after analyzing brain scans taken when blood samples were being drawn.

They hope the findings will lead to more formal plans for managing pain in premature babies.

Lead researcher Professor Maria Fitzgerald said: "We have shown for the first time that the information about pain reaches the brain in premature babies.

"Beforehand, although we could assume it, we did not know for sure that these babies could feel pain.

"These babies' brains are so immature that it was difficult to genuinely know that the pain was going to their brain."

Previous research had shown that premature babies are capable of displaying behavioral, physiological and metabolic signs of pain and distress.

However, the measures were all indirect and could be dismissed as bodily reflex reactions, rather than measures of true pain experience.

Researchers conducted brain scans on 18 babies in the neonatal unit at the Elizabeth Garrett Anderson and Obstetric Hospital in central London.


The scientists registered the brain activity in the babies - aged between 25 and 45 weeks from conception - before, during and after nurses performed blood tests using a heel lance.

The results showed a surge of blood and oxygen in the sensory area of their brains, meaning the pain was processed in the higher levels of the brain, the team said.

The team claimed the implications of the findings were clear, saying there was a potential for pain experience to influence brain development.

Reference: BBC News


News Flash

Abortion Clinic Worker Testifies that Live-Born Baby was Stabbed to Death


Wichita, KS, June 24, 2008 ( - A murder investigation has been opened involving Shelley Sella, a California abortionist employed by George Tiller, who according to a former employee is reported to have intentionally stabbed to death an infant born alive during an abortion at Tiller's Women's Health Care Services abortion clinic in Wichita, Kansas.

On the advice of an attorney, Operation Rescue reported the incident to the Wichita Police Department after a former Tiller employee, Tina Davis, told Troy Newman and Cheryl Sullenger of the stabbing in April. It is believed that the alleged infanticide took place sometime in the past two years.

In addition, the incident has been reported to the Kansas State Board of Healing Arts, which has confirmed that the case has been assigned to an investigator.

Ms. Davis is a Licensed Practical Nurse, and was the only licensed medical person in Tiller's employment at that time, except for his three out-of-state abortionists, who work at WHCS on a three-week rotating schedule.

Abortionist Shelley Sella is a "circuit rider", who splits her time between Tiller's Wichita clinic, a California Planned Parenthood clinic, and other, smaller abortion mills.

"Ms. Davis gave us a very specific eye-witness account about the incident," said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman. "We were told that the baby was 35 weeks gestation at the time of the abortion. The baby came out and was moving. Sella looked up at Ms. Davis, then picked up a utensil and stabbed the baby in the left ribcage, twisting the utensil until the baby quit moving. At 35 weeks, there is no doubt about viability. This is murder in anybody's book."

Ms. Davis could not explain why the baby was born alive since abortions that late in the pregnancy usually begin with a fatal injection into the baby's heart. However, former abortion patients have said that sometimes the first injection is not always successful.

In fact, Sella was involved in the abortion of Michelle Armesto-Berge, who testified before a Kansas legislative committee last September of her horrific late-term abortion experience at WHCS. According to her medical records, Armesto-Berge received the digoxin injection at the beginning of her abortion process, and was forced to receive a second injection by Sella when it was discovered that her baby was still alive the following day.

"The digoxin injection into the baby's heart is a difficult and risky procedure," said Newman. "Sella doesn't appear to be very good at it."

Ms. Davis also told Operation Rescue that on four occasions of which she was aware, women received the digoxin injection into their babies' hearts, and were sent home to their primary physician for "delivery of the stillborn."

"This practice has extreme risks, because the women, who come from all over the Western Hemisphere, could go into labor or experience a number of other dangerous complications before they are able to get to their own doctors," said Newman. "It is shocking that this is allowed."

Finish reading this at: LifeSiteNews


May 31, 2009: (WICHITA, Kan.) — On this balmy Sunday morning, Scott Roeder, 51, got up from a pew at Reformation Lutheran Church at the start of services and walked to the foyer, where two ushers were chatting around a table. Wordlessly, he pressed the barrel of a .22-caliber handgun to the forehead of Dr. George Tiller, one of the ushers, and pulled the trigger. Tiller was probably the biggest mass murderer in America.  He was a BIG player in death for dollars, as one of the nation's few late-term abortion providers. Read more: here

News Flash!

27 February 2008

Virginia cuts funding to planned parenthood

New American Hero
Bill Bolling
Bill Bolling
VA Lt Governor

The Virginia Senate decided to end taxpayer funding to abortion provider Planned Parenthood on Wednesday. Lt. Governor Bill Bolling cast the tie-breaking vote and approved the amendment to the state budget following the 20-20 tie vote among senators.

Attorney general hopeful Sen. Ken Cuccinelli II introduced the amendment. He explicitly attacked Planned Parenthood's abortion programs. "What we are doing is financing an abortion-mill operator," Cuccinelli said. "This will deny them that money."

Virginia joined Missouri in cutting funding to Planned Parenthood, who is responsible for most of the over 50 million babies murdered in America via abortion since the 1970's.  Missouri's Governor Matt Blunt cut funds to Planned Parenthood in his state last year.  Read about Missouri below.

Read this entire story: here pick
Missouri Governor Matt Blunt
for President

Matt Blunt
Matt Blunt


Taxpayer funds dry up for Planned Parenthood in MO

*A pro-life group is applauding Missouri's governor for ending the flow of taxpayer dollars to Planned Parenthood abortion clinics*.

For the past several years, low-income women in need of screenings for breast and cervical cancer were directed to Planned Parenthood clinics in Springfield and Joplin. However, Governor Matt Blunt has eliminated the funding streams to abortion providers and has redirected the funding for cancer screenings to other medical facilities.

Daniel McConchie, the Missouri representative of Americans United for Life, says it is not an easy task to uncover such funding.

McConchie encourages pro-life governors in other states to make sure that tax dollars are not going to abortion mills.




christian adoption
Click above picture to see more
(Bible Probe makes not 1 cent from this or any referral)

Differences of Adoption and Abortion
"Abortion is not just a simple medical procedure. For many women, it is a life-changing event with significant physical, emotional and spiritual consequences. Most women who struggle with past abortions say that they wish they had been told all of the facts about abortion and its risks."



  • Your pregnancy ends with giving life
  • You may feel good and positive about your choice
  • You will remember giving birth
  • You will have plenty of time to plan your and your baby's future
  • You can hold, name, and love your baby
  • You can have continued contact with your child
  • Your pregnancy ends with death
  • You may feel guilt and shame about your choice
  • You will remember taking a life
  • Abortion is final; you can’t reverse your decision
  • You will never know or treasure your baby
  • You will miss the opportunity to see your child develop

Abortion Linked to Premature Births

7 June 2005: Such findings are based on data collected and analyzed by Dr. Caroline Moreau of Hospital de Bicetre and her colleagues. As reported by, the researchers concluded "that women with a history of abortion were 1.5 times more likely to give birth very prematurely (under 33 weeks gestation), and 1.7 times more likely to have a baby born extremely (under 28 weeks gestation) preterm."

Also, statistics show that teenage girls who have abortions are twice as likely to commit suicide and are much more likely to suffer other mental-health problems.


What the Ku Klux Klan Could Only Dream About The Abortion Industry is Accomplishing
American blacks should be made aware what is happening to them.  More black babies have been aborted than have ever died in the U.S.  In 1996, the most recent year for which abortion statistics are available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were approximately 1,221,585 abortions performed in the United States.  Since 1973, approx 13 million black babies have been killed by abortion.   Also since Since 1973, abortion has reduced the black population by over 25 percent.  Twice as many African-Americans have died from abortion than have died from AIDS, accidents, violent crimes, cancer, and heart disease combined. Planned Parenthood operates the nation's largest chain (nearly nearly 850 death centers) of abortion clinics and almost 80 percent of its facilities are located in minority neighborhoods.  

About 13 percent of American women are black, but they submit to over 35 percent of the abortions.  These quotes are from

Liberal Democrats smile in your face and court Black votes; while managing to kill you

Without abortion, America's African-American population of 42 million people would be about 35% larger today. 

Who is responsible for this?  The same political party who always courts African-American votes, which blacks have always voted for.  The Democratic party is without a doubt the force behind this murder of America's babies, and especially African-American babies.  Yet blacks seem blind to this.  John Kerry, Ted Kennedy and nearly all Democrats admit they are for abortion.  Who can doubt the Democrat resolve to sustain and advance abortion after watching any Supreme Court nomination proceeding?  Then, why do African-American continue to vote Democrat, which means their demise?

John Kerry argues that an unborn child is not a person, so this unborn baby is therefore not protected by the law.  Blacks should remember that the Supreme Court used this same basic flawed argument in 1857 during their "Dred Scott" decision.  The outcome, was that this court declared that blacks simply weren't persons because they were inferior; so the law didn't protect them.

Is the Supreme Court always right?

The Dred Scott decision of 1857 upheld slavery as legal. It decreed that black people are the private property of the slave owners. This was a grave error of the Supreme Court, denying African Americans one of their most fundamental human rights — the right to liberty. In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court erred again by denying a whole class of human beings (preborn babies) the most fundamental right — the right to life.
Did you know that Margaret Sanger, the 1921 founder of the American Birth Control League, the forerunner of the Planned Parenthood (1942) worked closely with W.E.B. Du Bois on his "Negro Project," an effort to expose Southern black women to birth control.  Margaret Sanger also wrote many articles sympathetic to eugenics, some in Socialist papers. 
NEWS about Breast Cancer:
If you have had an abortion while you were in a non-life threatening (yours) situation - and you later developed breast cancer - you may want to look into suing your abortion doctor. 

Breast cancer kills more women in the 40 - 59 year age group than just about anything else.  Breast cancer in woman has dramatically increased right alongside abortion since 1972.  In 1962 there were 63,000 cases.  In 1972 that jumped to 90,000 cases of breast cancer detected.  And in 2002 there were an estimated 203,500 cases. 

A link between much higher numbers of breast cancer in those women who have also had abortions has been well known and studied since the early 1990's.  The earliest abortion/breast cancer correlation we know of was reported in a 1957 study.  Evidence for this abortion/breast cancer link began mounting in the 1970's - 1980's.  Yet abortion doctors usually chose to either ignore this, or "hide it   under the rug".
There have been at least 37 studies on this breast cancer / abortion link.  More than 75% of these studies (28) show that abortion is a risk factor. 
This increase risk in breast cancer may have something to do with the body's normal release of increased estrogen during pregnancy suddenly being interfered with in abortion.

August 2, 2005:

Using 1990-2003 data, a Pfizer/National Medical Association study has found. that the breast-cancer death rate for black women was 14 percent higher than for white women in 1990, yet 36 percent higher in 2002.

See this real story about a woman dying of Breast Cancer:  HERE


ABORTION - and LINK to Breast Cancer

If you have had an abortion while you were in a non-life threatening (yours) situation - and you later developed breast cancer - you may want to look into suing your abortion doctor. 
Breast cancer kills more women in the 40 - 59 year age group than just about anything else.  Breast cancer in woman has dramatically increased right alongside abortion since 1972.  In 1962 there were 63,000 cases, in 1972 that jumped to 90,000 cases of breast cancer detected, and in 2002 there were an estimated 203,500 cases.  A link between much higher numbers of breast cancer in those women who have also had abortions has been known and studied since the early 1990's.  Evidence for this abortion-breast cancer link began mounting in the 1970's - 1980's.  Yet abortion doctors usually chose to discount this.
There have been 37 studies on the breast cancer link (which may have something to do with the body's normal release of estrogen in women being interfered with in abortion).  More than 75% of these studies (28) show that abortion is a risk factor.

Angela Lanfranchi, M.D. is a breast surgeon in New Jersey.  Angela came across the abortion/breast-cancer link in the early 1990's when she noticed that larger numbers of young women were coming into her office with breast cancer - who also had a history with abortion, often in their teens.

She wasn't the first to notice this correlation.  Angela also noticed that studies showing this correlation were not getting into clinicians' literature.  She says it made her mad.  She couldn't stand seeing those 30-year olds in the office, with breast cancer with little toddlers.  "These children weren't going to have their mothers" she said.

Angela said that in 1996 she read a meta-analysis of the relevant studies by a Joel Brind, Ph.D. who was a biology professor at Baruch College in New York, who helped put the pieces together.  According to Joel's article the first study that showed a link between breast cancer and abortion was published in 1957 in the prominent English-language Japanese Journal of Cancer Research.  In those days, abortion was legal in Japan.

At the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Institute in Seattle, cancer researcher Janet Daling and a team of scholars found "[a]mong women who had been pregnant at least once, the breast cancer rate in those who had experienced an induced abortion was 50 percent higher than among other women.  Highest risks were observed when the abortion was done at ages younger than 18 years...or at least 30 years of age or older."

Abortions linked to breast cancer again
'Women aren't being given this information'
October 4, 2007

© 2007

A new study shows that abortions can be classified as carcinogens, because the number of breast cancer cases can be predicted reasonably accurately based on the number of abortions in a given population.

The study, "The Breast Cancer Epidemic: Modeling and Forecasts Based on Abortion and Other Risk Factors," was done by Patrick S. Carroll of London-based research institute PAPRI and the results were published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons this week.

It shows, that among risk factors, abortion is the "best predictor of breast cancer." The results show that countries with higher abortions rates, such as England and Wales, higher breast cancer incidence is reported. "Where abortion rates are low (i.e. Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic) a smaller increase is expected," the study said.

Karen Malec, of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer, works to publicize such links in the group's battle against breast cancers.

"Actually women have the right to be told this particular research and the biology supports what we know about female biology during pregnancy," she said. "Women should be told – especially before the birth of a first child – abortions are highly, highly, carcinogenic."

Read this entire article at WND: here

If you were born after 1972, we challenge you to consider yourself a Survivor of the Abortion Holocaust. 1/3 of your generation has been killed by abortion in America!

Visit Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust


Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act tells it all

As of November 6th, 2006

Note that only 7 Democrats in the entire nation even stand behind legislation that would notify women, that when a doctor reaches in and crushes the skull of her baby with cold metal forcipes - the tiny baby DOES feel unbelievable pain, as this real, feeling, human being is being murdered...

Congressional Legislation

Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act
Bill # H.R.4420

Original Sponsor:
Christopher Smith (R-NJ 4th)

Cosponsor Total: 110
(last sponsor added 10/08/2004)
7 Democrats
103 Republicans

About This Legislation:
To ensure that women seeking an abortion are fully informed regarding the pain experienced by their unborn child.

Unborn children can experience pain, and they can certainly respond to touch from outside the womb. Any woman who has been blessed with carrying a baby in the second trimester can tell you this.

To address this issue, U.S. Christopher H. Smith [NJ] has introduced--with 63 cosponsors--the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act (H.R.4420), which would require those who perform abortions on unborn children 20 weeks after fertilization to inform the woman seeking an abortion of the medical evidence that the unborn child feels pain--

a. through a verbal statement given by the abortion provider, and also

b. by providing a brochure--developed by the Department of Health and Human Services--that goes into more detail than the verbal statement on the medical evidence of pain experienced by an unborn child 20 weeks after fertilization

The bill would also ensure that the woman, if she chooses to continue with the abortion procedure after being given the medical information, has the option of choosing anesthesia for the child, so that the unborn child's pain is less severe.


Pregnant? Need Help?
You have Options!
Learn more at
or call them at: 800-395-HELP
( did not either place or approve of this ad. There are no paid ads here!)


Genetic Technology: Evidence of Murder

By Kelly Hollowell, J.D., Ph.D.

Science Ministries - On the dawn of a new era in genetic technology, most people are focusing on the potential benefits of drugs tailor-made for individuals, gene therapy, and predictive testing.  Others fear the possible abuses of science and technology, and the creation of a "brave new world."

So, as scientists, politicians, and ethicists argue about the technology, where should our focus as Christians lie?  First, Christians have the opportunity and obligation to take the lead on the social and legal policies that keep pace with technology.  Currently, there are few such policies in place.  Getting involved on the ground floor  will be key to future decisions that will affect our worldview.  Second, if we put our minds to it, understanding the technology might be used to our advantage to undo some current policies not in agreement with Biblical principles.

Here is the prime example: Thanks to our understanding of the human genome and cloning technology, Christians can now state with scientific conviction that life begins at conception.  Even the secular community agrees.

The first page of the New York Times article about the new "gene map" is quoted as saying that, "the human genome is a pearl, a model of high performance and reliability.  Millions of times a year, egg genome meets sperm genome and the result is a human baby, its parts all in place, its brains a universe of love and meaning."(1) Combine this understanding with what we know from cloning experiments.  

Scientific studies have shown that a cloned life cannot become anything but a genetic duplicate of the original, even at its earliest stages.  It is set on a predetermined pathway of life from the moment of conception.  It cannot have a different eye color.  It cannot have a different hair color.  It is a carbon copy in every physiological respect.  We have only to read between the genetic lines to understand that this means life begins at conception.  

Now apply this understanding to current abortion policy.  In 1973, Justice Harry Blackmun is quoted from Roe v. Wade as saying, "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins.  When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate."(2)

Clearly, today, that is no longer the case.  We can now say with scientific certainty when life begins.  It only requires getting this information into the hands of committed Christians who will tolerate the abomination of abortion no longer.  Proponents of abortion must be made to listen to themselves.  At a minimum, they must be forced to acknowledge that if they persist in their policies regarding abortion, then they must own up to murder.  

No more sugarcoated terms like "viability" and "preembryo" should be permitted.  If a child's life has no value as compared to the mother, at least force proponents of abortion to say so.  Let's force them to have the intellectual integrity to stand behind their "choice" to kill the child.  Let's no longer allow them to hide behind the veil of ignorance and technical terminology.  If they must kill, let them be branded as murderers and nothing less.  

Forcing their hand on this issue will not be easy.  It is no small irony that, on the dawn of this new era, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of partial birth abortion.  Our work is cut out for us, but God and science are on our side.  Let's embrace this cutting edge technology and use it, for once, the way our opponents always do, to our advantage.

Early Church Fathers were Unanimously against Abortion

June 15, 2009 ( - This article presents the Christian attitude toward abortion before the first ecumenical council, that is, until A.D. 325. Because the New Testament does not comment on the morality of abortion, this article considers the writings of the first generations of Christians after the apostles, for they indicate that opposition to abortion (1) was shared at a time when the writers — or Christians not many generations earlier — personally knew the apostles or their first disciples and thus benefited from their unwritten teachings and interpretations of Scripture, (2) comes from a date so early that there was no likelihood for the original gospel to have been corrupted, and (3) is not based on only one interpretation of the Bible among many but was the interpretation of Christians who were personally familiar with the New Testament writers or their early followers.

With the exception of one author who wrote at length on the subject, early Christian writings do not discuss abortion in depth but merely state in a few words or phrases that it was forbidden to Christians. Most of the authors of the period do not touch on the subject but those who did considered it among the worst of sins.

The earliest source is an anonymous church manual of the late first century called The Didache. It commands “thou shall not murder a child by abortion nor kill that which is begotten.” (at 2.2)

The Epistle of Barnabas contains a similar guide to Christian morality. It was composed sometime between A.D. 70 and 132 and was included in some early versions of the New Testament. In the midst of several chapters of instructions on ethics, it states: “Thou shall not slay the child by procuring abortion; nor, again, shalt thou destroy it after it is born.” (19.5) The latter phrase refers to the ancient Greek and Roman practice of abandoning newborns to die in unpopulated areas if the baby was the “wrong” sex or suspected of health problems. To the author of Barnabas, this practice and abortion were equal in sinfulness.

Dating from just before A.D. 150, the Revelation of Peter was still read in church services in fifth-century Palestine. It describes in detail the various punishments in hell according to different types of sin. The punishment for women who induced miscarriage was to sit up to their necks in blood and dirt while the aborted children shot sparks of fire into their eyes (Chapter 25). Clement of Alexandria, the principal of Christendom's foremost Christian educational institution at the end of the second century, accepted these statements as an accurate exposition of the Faith (Extracts from the Prophets 41; 48; 49).

In Paedagogus 2.10.96 Clement spoke negatively of women who “apply lethal drugs which directly lead to death, destroying all humane feeling simultaneously with the fetus.”

Clement and other early Christian writers often quoted from the Sibylline Oracles as the work of a pagan prophet who had predicted the coming Christ like the Jewish ones. Later, the Sibyllines were rewritten to increase the proportion of Christian ethical teaching. Oracle 2 describes abortion as contrary to God's law, while Oracle 3 commands people to raise their children instead of angering God by killing them.

A Plea for the Christians was written around A.D. 177 by “Athenagoras the Athenian, Philosopher and Christian”, partly to convince the Roman Emperor that there was no truth in the rumor that Christians ritually murdered and ate babies. In declaring that such a practice was contrary to Christian ethics, Athenagoras emphasized the sacredness of unborn life:

And when we say that those women who use drugs to bring on abortion commit murder, and will have to give an account to God for the abortion, on what principle should we commit murder? For it does not belong to the same person to regard the very foetus in the womb as a created being, and therefore an object of God's care, and when it has passed into life, to kill it; and not to expose an infant, because those who expose them are chargeable with child-murder. (Chapter 35)

Finish reading this at:


Call or Visit
Care Net

pro life

Care Net's strategy is simple.  They hope and pray women are led to their local pro-life pregnancy center before they are deceived into choosing death at an abortion clinic.

Care Net also seeks to exalt Jesus Christ and to bring new hope to those who have been led astray.  Many women who visit Care Net pregnancy Centers are trapped in destructive lifestyles.  Many find themselves pressured by partners, parents and peers to end their pregnancies. And many more have simply fallen for the lie that abortion is their only feasible pregnancy option.

The ministry of Care Net is about presenting the Gospel of Jesus and presenting the Gospel of Life.

Read the story of Lori.... A young mother who chose life after visiting Care Net's site for women.

Single and pregnant, Lori thought that ending her pregnancy was the only way out.  She made an appointment for an abortion.  But still having questions, Lori logged onto her computer and typed in the word "abortion".  That is how Lori found the Care Net website.

When Lori called the Care Net Option line 1-800 number, she reached one of their caring consultants and was encouraged to consider positive pregnancy options.  Then Lori was connected to her local Care Net pregnancy center.  After visiting her local Care Net center and receiving counseling from Christians, Lori chose life for her baby.

Lori said; "I am so thankful for my beautiful brown-eyed Emily, and am grateful that I found the website"....

Visit the Care Net website HERE



May 2008 News

Abortion: Planned Parenthood Coverups - in Ohio

Planned Parenthood, the "abortion killing machine", is being sued for covering up a statutory rape in Ohio.

The rape happened to an innocent 13-year-old girl who was seduced by her 21-year-old soccer coach, who got her pregnant.

The rapist got caught... convicted... and he's serving a long prison sentence right now.

But before he got caught for the statutory rape, he forced the little girl to have an abortion at a local Planned Parenthood murder mill (to cover up his crime).

In direct violation of Ohio state laws, Planned Parenthood did not notify the little girl's parents that she was trying to get an abortion. Nor did they tell the authorities about this obvious statutory rape.

Attorneys are suing Planned Parenthood for covering up the statutory rape. Reportedly, this cover-up is something Planned Parenthood routinely does, all over the country.

Planned Parenthood knows that if they lose this lawsuit, other victims might sue them. And at some point, they might have to turn over all their records of abortions performed on underage girls. Incidentally, Planned Parenthood have more than 850 murder mills throughout the United States, and they murder approximately, 227,375 unborn babies in the most painful inhuman ways, each year.


Abortionists to surrender records of child rape?

Ohio Planned Parenthood Abortion Center Sued Over Incest Case Coverup


"The fruit of abortion is nuclear war. What you do to the unborn child, you do to Jesus." - Mother Teresa of Calcutta

Please read More at Let Us Reason Ministries

Birth of an Angel


Once upon a time there was a child ready to be born.  So one day, she asked God:

They tell me you are sending me to earth tomorrow, but how am I going to live there being so small and helpless?
Among the many angels, I chose one for you.  She'll be waiting for you and will take care of you.

But, tell me, here in Heaven, I don't do anything else but sing and smile - that's enough for me to be happy.
Your angel will sing for you and will also smile for you everyday.  And you will feel your angel's love and be happy.

And how am I going to be able to understand when people talk to me, if I don't know the language men talk?
Your angel will tell you the most beautiful and sweet words you will ever hear, and with much patience and care, your angel will teach you how to speak.

And what am I going to do when I want to talk to you?
Your angel will place your hands together and teach you how to pray.

I've heard that on earth there are bad men.  Who will protect me?
Your angel will defend you - even if it means risking her life.

But I will always be sad because I will not see you anymore.
Your angel will always talk to you about me and will teach you the way for you to come back to me - even though I will always be next to you.

At that moment, there was much peace in heaven.  But voices from earth could already be heard and the child, in a hurry, asked softly:

Oh, God, if I'm about to leave now, please tell me my angel's name.
Your angel's name is of no importance.  You will just call your angel, "Mommy".


pro life



RU-486 is an abortion cocktail that takes up to 44 days to end unwanted pregnancies and is a back-alley solution in developing countries.

Strong and reliable evidence exists that this two-drug abortion regimen is far from safe for women!

In 2005, the FDA admitted to receiving more than 600 reports of serious complications from the use of RU-486.  These complications include bacterial infections, bleeding, ruptured ectopic pregnancies, and death.  In July 2005, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revealed that five American women had died after using RU-486.

NEWS - 17 March 2006

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Two more women have died after using the so-called "abortion pill" RU-486, regulators said Friday in a warning that brought renewed calls for pulling the drug combination from the market.

The Food and Drug Administration warned doctors to watch for a rare but deadly infection previously implicated in four deaths of women who had taken RU-486. The drug combination, also called Mifeprex or mifepristone, has not been proved to be the cause in any of those cases.


See the lies Pro-Abortions told to get acceptance of abortion..
The Marketing of Evil
by David Kupelian
See at Amazon here


struggling for life

Struggling for Life
by Dr. Kelly Hollowell

How your Tax Dollars and Twisted Science Target the Unborn

The most dangerous time in any child's life is his or her first nine months. That's because abortion takes one out of every four children conceived in America, making the route from womb to tomb very short for millions of unborn boys and girls. "Struggling for Life" provides a shocking glimpse into how your tax dollars and twisted biomedical research are targeting the unborn. Written by Dr. Kelly Hollowell, WND contributor and founder of Science Ministries, Inc., this riveting, sometimes personal account details the gushing flow of federal dollars into the coffers of America's leading abortion performer.

$9.00 at here


party of death

The Party of Death: The Democrats, the Media, the Courts, and the Disregard for Human Life

by Ramesh Ponnuru

They celebrate abortion on demand as a fundamental human right. They advocate euthanasia, and work energetically for embryo-killing research. They explicitly deny that all human beings are equal in having a right to life, and unblushingly propose the creation of a category of "human non-persons" who can be treated as expendable. In line with that, some of them have already begun calling for the killing of sick infants -- for their own good, of course. They are the party of death, and they are becoming increasingly powerful in America today, as well as in the world at large.

Now, in The Party of Death: The Democrats, the Media, the Courts, and the Disregard for Human Life, National Review's Ramesh Ponnuru provides an unflinching exposé of their past successes, present activities, and future plans, showing why their principles are so harmful - and how they can be defeated before they destroy our society altogether.

Members of the party of death, Ponnuru notes here, are everywhere. They have taken over the Democratic party lock, stock, and barrel -- although they can be found in both parties. He details how the pernicious influence of this dedicated band has permeated every aspect of our culture, corrupting law, politics, and even the teaching of history. Legal abortion, Ponnuru reveals, has unlocked the floodgates for numerous issues that have advanced the death culture, leading directly to the current national debates on euthanasia and embryo-killing for research purposes.

All this has happened, Ponnuru explains, with active help from the media establishment: with collusion from leading media figures, leading Democrats such as Hillary and Bill Clinton, Barbara Boxer, and Mario Cuomo have cannily camouflaged the party of death's extreme and outlandish views. But they haven't yet won a total victory. Ponnuru argues that the same process by which the party of death has made such deep inroads into American society can now be used in reverse: pro-lifers must strive harder than ever to restrict abortion and ultimately to end it altogether, for the more we reject abortion, the more we may come to reject other choices for death, too.

In an America that is turning away from abortion on demand, the Democrats may prove to be the last victims of the party of death. In The Party of Death, Ramesh Ponnuru provides a solid and encouraging program to relegate this poisonous party to the dustbin of history.


Britain (Ephraim) in Prophesy - because of abortion

Britain in Bible prophesy is known as Ephraim (the US is known as Manasseh). Let's look at some startling prophecies that just may be coming true in Britain right this very moment.

Britain lost its way, when it first legalized abortion in 1967. In the 40 years since abortion has been legal in Britain, the number of babies murdered via abortion has steadily increased each year, from 22,000 in 1967 to over 200,000 a year there now. Since 1967 over 6.7 million babies have been murdered in Britain. Britain has become a mecca for women from all over Europe who are seeking to murder their children.

This was prophesied by the Eternal God over 2700 years ago

Hosea 9: 11 and 13

11 As for Ephraim, their glory shall fly away like a bird, from the birth, and from the womb, and from the conception.

13 Ephraim, as I saw Tyrus, is planted in a pleasant place: but Ephraim shall bring forth his children to the murderer.

In addition to killing off so many of their own children, before they are even born the Lord warned that the British would become infertile. The Telegraph reported, One in 64 babies is born after IVF (in vitro fertilization), figures released today show, as more British couples seek fertility treatment... More than 32,000 women had IVF treatment in 2005 in Britain, up 6 percent from the previous year. In total there were only 722,500 babies born in Britain in 2005. 11,262 of which were a result of IVF. The fact is that for most of these lives born as a result of IVF, at least one partner in the relationship would probably be infertile.

This evidence of growing infertility in Britain makes one take a questioning look at what else God said about Britain through the prophet Hosea:

Hosea 9:16
16 Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear no fruit: yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb.

"Slay even the beloved fruit of their womb"? In this regard it is worthy to note here. Only a few countries in Europe have more stillbirths than women in Britain do. In 2007, almost 4000 stillbirth baby deaths occurred in Britain. That's 10 a day in both England and Wales. This rate has stayed steady for over a decade.

Why Britain you may ask? There's a moral sickness in Britain, much the same as America is inflicted with. This moral sickness has caused the loss of Britain's glory. So, the same will happen to America because both keep murdering their babies.

Article above --figures and outline taken from an article (The Sick Man of Europe?) in the March 2008 issue of The Philadelphia Trumpet.


Who is Responsible for these Millions of Murdered Babies?

Democrats, Feminists and You...

This article below is a really good read about the feminist movement and it's hypocritical viewpoints. It is a bit long, but very much worth the time!

7. Commentary by by Don Feder, Posted Mar 07, 2006:

Back in the 1980s, when conservative social critics suggested it was better for the mothers of young children to stay home (instead of consigning them to day-care gulags), feminists were furious.

"How dare you tell women what to do!" they screeched. "The nerve trying to tell us how to live our lives!"

So, guess who's now telling women how to live, and excoriating them for thinking independently? Feminists. Under a veneer of empowerment, the movement has always been fascistic. It's instructive to now see the sisters goose-stepping out of the totalitarian closet, truncheons raised to smash errant skulls.

Leading the charge is Linda Hirshman, lawyer, professor and scourge of stay-at-home moms.

Recently, ABC's Good Morning America (which my friends at the Media Research Center call "Good Morning Morons") showcased Hirshman's rant on two consecutive shows, in segments titled Mommy Wars: To Work or Stay at Home?

and How to Raise Kids: Stay Home or Go to Work?

Typical of what passes for balance on the networks, Good Morning America afforded roughly 80% of each segment to Hirshman's views. Dissenters got nodding notice to maintain the pretence of fairness.

Hirshman has attained celebrity status by alerting us to the under-reported crisis of our time -- despite decades of feminist indoctrination (delivered from the classroom to entertainment television --where what used to be called housewives are practically nonexistent) -- women are actually choosing to stay at home and nurture their children. Global terrorism, global warming - kids' stuff, by comparison.

ABC cited census data showing 54% of mothers with a graduate or professional degree no longer work full- time. This is bolstered by Hirshman's own study of 30 women whose wedding announcements appeared in the New York Times in 2003 and 2004. Only five are now working full-time outside the home. Ten work part time. The rest lead lives unsatisfactory to Hirshman and her allies.

Feminists are threatened by this phenomenon. It's ideology -- and not the interests of women, individually or collectively -- that drives them.

Hirshman's position: Stay-at-home moms are leading impoverished lives, wasting their educations, short-changing their children (who miss the joys of being raised by total strangers who are paid to care about them) and doing incalculable damage to the cause of women's rights.

"I think it's a terrible mistake for these highly educated and capable women to make that choice (choosing children and home over career), Hirshman declares. "I am saying an educated, competent adult'' place is in the office." Yes, I think we got that.

The Ms. Magazine Poster Person isn't buying the argument that raising the next generation is in any way, shape or form fulfilling. "I would like to see a description of their daily lives that substantiates that," Hirshman harrumphs. "Their description of their lives does not sound particularly interesting or fulfilling for a complicated person, for a complicated, educated person," she adds.

What Hirshman means is: "I don't find their lives particularly interesting or fulfilling -- and my judgment is the measure of all things." And to think, feminists have been accused of elitism.

Hirshman belittles those women who believe there's no substitute for mom.

She pushes a proposition absurd on its face -- that there is no difference in the "happiness levels" of children consigned to the Joyful Tots Detention Center, versus those raised at home.

In the first place, only someone with a PhD. (a complicated, educated idiot) thinks happiness levels can be measured. And what about the disease and abuse (physical and sexual) rampant in day care? How about the fact that children in day care tend to be more aggressive and less socialized that their raised-at-home peers?

Have you ever witnessed the heart-rending spectacle of a three-year-old crying and pushing its mother away -- screaming that it wants to be taken to day care? Nor will you.

As a counterpoint to Hirshman, Good Morning America presented Debbie Klett, a mother who left a job in ad sales and founded a magazine called Total 180, to spend more time with her kids.

Klett: "For me, I feel it is vital to be there for my children every day, to consistently tend to their needs, to grow their self-esteem, and to praise them when they're right, guide them when they're not, and to be a loving, caring mom every minute of the day."

Why, the anti-social wretch!

To clinch her argument, Hirshman notes the divorce rate is over 40%.

These ninnies, says she, they devote themselves to hubby and kinder, then they're cast aside in a divorce and see their standard of living take a nose dive.

But it was feminists in the '70s who pushed no-fault divorce, which -- they maintained -- would liberate women from stultifying marriages. Now they're using the divorce rate to scare women into the workforce. Talk about chutzpah.

Hirshman has a prescription for the ticking of biological clocks: "Have a baby. (If you must.) Just don't have two," which makes work outside the home

Also, Hirshman advises, find Mr. Mom -- a guy who's into diapers and dirty dishes. "You can either find a spouse with less social power (read: money) than you or find one with an ideological commitment to gender equality (read: gender sameness)."

I can just picture the personal ad: "Feminist seeks socially inferior, self-neutered male who believes that men and women are emotionally androgynous. Objective: A matrimonial merger and the production of one child, who will be raised by the proverbial village on The Feminist Mystique and Our Bodies, Our Selves (between viewings of Thelma and Louise and G.I. Jane)."

In the '80s, young women had a word for such fine specimens -- "wimp."

Linda Hirshman is doing a great service to humanity. She is glaringly obnoxious proof of what conservatives have been saying for decades --feminists hate the family. (Hirshman: "The family -- with its repetitious, socially invisible, physical tasks -- is a necessary part of life, but allows fewer opportunities for full human flourishing than public spheres like the market or government.")

In other words, the female insurance executive or the female junior college instructor (lecturing a roomful of bored freshmen in a 101 course) is engaged in stimulating, fulfilling, socially useful activity, while the mother who sees a human being developing on a daily basis, and shapes that life more than anyone else, is a brain-dead drudge and a dupe.

Here's the ultimate irony: Feminists are anti-feminine. They reject hearth and home, procreation and childrearing (unless it's done by "professionals"). They deny the maternal instinct. They condemn the feminine urge to nurture and to create a safe haven from the perils of modern life.
(They also deny the male imperative to serve and protect.) Everything that's distinctive about their sex, they abhor.

Because they hate their nature, they are self- loathing. Most are miserable -- and deservedly so.

For almost 20 years, I worked in a newsroom with these resentful, envious, humorless harpies. An uglier lot you will never find -- this side of Alien vs. Predator.

Most were deeply unhappy with their lives, always ready to take offense at imaginary slights, convinced that any lack of advancement was due to a chauvinist conspiracy and angry at those who challenged feminist dogma. They were about as much fun as Hillary on a bad hair day (speaking of resentful, envious, humorless harpies).

Who in their right mind would take life advice from such spiritually misshapen creatures? ABC News, of course.

This article was originally posted at

Mr. Feder is a former syndicated columnist for the Boston Herald and author of Who's Afraid of the Religious Right? (Regnery) and A Jewish Conservative Looks at Pagan America. He works as a freelance writer and media consultant and serves as the president of Jews Against Anti-Christian Defamation.


Catholic visitors may want to visit Father Frank Pavone's site, "Priests for Life" here

A powerful and critically acclaimed new video documentary on Darwinism – which proves the evolutionary theory's founder should share with Adolph Hitler the blame for the Holocaust, as well as for the more than 52 million American lives lost to abortion


Titled "Darwin’s Deadly Legacy," the stunning documentary shows that Darwinian theory, "which is scientifically bankrupt, has probably been responsible for more bloodshed than anything else in the history of humanity," said Jerry Newcomb, one of the program's two co-producers.

Before the advent of Darwinian beliefs, said Newcombe, the Western world's basic concept was that man was made in the image of God, and was therefore valuable. But Darwin changed all that.

"Karl Marx wouldn’t embrace all (Darwin's) tenets, but said, 'This is a scientific theory on which we can base our theory of man,'" Newcomb told WND.

And according to Ann Coulter, bestselling author of "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," Hitler was simply taking Darwinism from the theoretical to the practical.

"He thought the Aryans were the fittest and he was just hurrying natural selection along," Coulter said.

Coulter is among the experts who appear in the special. Others are Lee Strobel, journalist/author of "The Case for a Creator," Jonathan Wells, author of "Icons of Evolution," Human Genome Project Director Francis Collins and Richard Weikart, author of the book "Darwin's Deadly Legacy," on which the program is based.

The program also addresses eugenics, a term coined by Darwin’s own cousin, Francis Galton, who campaigned for using human genetics as a means to breed superior beings.

"We talk about the link between Darwin and Hitler, and in the middle ground, eugenics," said Newcomb. "Darwin led to eugenics, which led directly to Hitler."

"I was just shocked about a week ago, (when a news report) talked about a designer clinic where you could design your own baby. They said everybody seems to want perfect Aryans. Where have we heard that?" asked Newcomb.

"To put it simply – no Darwin, no Hitler," said Kennedy, who is host for the special. "Hitler tried to speed up evolution, to help it along, and millions suffered and died in unspeakable ways because of it."

In the United States, nearly three dozen states at one point mandated sterilization programs to prevent the "feebleminded" and other "defectives" from reproducing.

A direct result of that concept is today’s Planned Parenthood, as the production documents, whose founder Margaret Sanger believed in removing what she called the "dead weight of human waste."

"Eugenics is applied Darwinism," said Coulter.

The culmination of that belief system appears to have been the Columbine massacre. There, students Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris killed 12 other students, a teacher and themselves, after setting out on a plan to kill 500.

"Harris wrote on his website, 'YOU KNOW WHAT I LOVE??? Natural SELECTION! It’s the best thing that ever happened to the Earth. Getting rid of all the stupid and weak organisms,'" the documentary reports.

Reports show that on the day of the attack, Harris wore a T-shirt with the words, "Natural Selection."

All this happened, said Kennedy, because of a set of theories based on "a crumbling scientific foundation."

As WND reported recently, hundreds of Ph.D. scientists are now stepping forward and publicly dissenting from Darwinian theory.


See this DVD documentary: here


Are you Giving Aid to Abortion?

without even knowing it...

The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has spent tens of millions of U.S. tax dollars to promote so-called "reproductive rights" programs in Third World countries.

In 2006 USAID spent $371,249,000.00 - all of it tax dollars - for "reproductive health" programs.  That's code for abortion, sterilization, contraception and other population control programs.

Making this situation even more desperate, USAID has joined forces with the world's foremost proponent of abortion, the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF).

And Planned Parenthood's own "research" organization, the Guttmacher Institute, confirms the fact that it is your tax dollars that are funding the world's "population control" movement:

"The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has been and remains the single largest contributor of funds for family planning and reproductive health services worldwide.  In addition, it is the single largest donor of contraceptives globally."

Agencies at the United Nations - funded in part by your tax dollars - are also active promoters of abortion.  They "bribe" poor nations.  They withhold funds for food, clean water, roads, health care and other vital needs, until developing nations implement UN programs which promote abortion and forced sterilization.

On top of this, billionaires like Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and Ted Turner help finance this deadly agenda.  Turner gave over $1 million to fund UN "population control" programs.  The Bill and Linda Gates Foundation has given IPPF over $20 BILLION!

/s/ Rev. Thomas J. Euteneuer, President
Human Life International

Vatican urges end to Amnesty aid
13 June 2007

The Vatican described abortion as "murder"

The Vatican has urged all Catholics to stop donating money to Amnesty International, accusing the human rights group of promoting abortion.

The Vatican also said it was suspending all financial aid to Amnesty over what it said was the group's recent change of policy on the issue.

Amnesty said it was not promoting abortion as a universal right.

But the group said that women had a right to choose, particularly in cases of rape or incest.

"No more financing of Amnesty International after the organization's pro-abortion about-turn," said a statement from the Roman Catholic Church's Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace.

'Misrepresented account'

The council's president, Cardinal Renato Martino, described abortion as "murder".

"And to justify it selectively, in the event of rape, that is to define an innocent child in the belly of its mother as an enemy, as 'something one can destroy'," the cardinal said.

Amnesty says it does not take any position on whether abortion is right or wrong.

But it defended its new position in support of abortion for women when their health is in danger or human rights are violated, especially in cases of rape or incest.

"We are saying broadly that to criminalise women's management of their sexual reproductive right is the wrong answer," Amnesty's deputy Secretary General Kate Gilmore told Reuters news agency.

"The Catholic Church, through a misrepresented account of our position on selective aspects of abortion, is placing in peril work on human rights," Ms Gilmore said.

Some 45 million unintended pregnancies are terminated around the world every year, the World Health Organization says.

Nearly 70,000 women die annually from unsafe abortions, it says.

Giuliani (the Terrible)

Lightning Cuts Off Mic Twice During Giuliani's Defense of Abortion Support
Occurred just as Giuliani took mic to answer question about sharp criticism of his position from Catholic Bishop Tobin

By Gudrun Schultz and John Jalsevac
June 2007


NEW HAMPSHIRE, June 6, 2007 ( - In what is being perceived as an eerie instance of coincidence, a series of lightning strikes caused audio disruption at the exact moments when pro-abortion presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani attempted to defend his support for abortion despite his supposed Roman Catholic faith. The lightning storm occurred during a New Hampshire debate.

The first bolt hit just as the former New York mayor took the mic to answer a question about the sharp criticism his position on abortion garnered him from Rhode Island Catholic Bishop Thomas J. Tobin, who publicly condemned Giuliani for his abortion stance earlier this week.

Bishop Tobin compared Giuliani's refusal to oppose abortion to Pontius Pilate's role in the crucifixion of Christ.

"I can just hear Pilate saying, 'You know, I'm personally opposed to crucifixion but I don't want to impose my belief on others," Bishop Tobin wrote in a column for the Providence Catholic news.

As Giuliani began to brush aside Bishops Tobin's view, a crack of lightning caused the sound system to give out and cut off his mic. Wolf Blitzer of CNN, who was moderating the debate,  pointed out the electronic disturbance was caused by lightning.

The audience burst into laughter, evidently recognizing the possible interpretations of the eerie event.

Giuliani said, laughing, as his debate opponents backed away from him in jest, "For someone who went to parochial schools all his life, this is a very frightening thing." However, a second bolt crashed moments later, just as Giuliani opened his mouth to answer the question again, cutting him off as he attempted to say he "respected" the views of Catholic and religious leaders.

He finally completed his answer audibly, despite two more lightning strikes, reiterating his position that while he believes abortion to be wrong, he does not believe it should be illegal. Giuliani's insistence of remaining on the fence over the issue was condemned by Bishop Tobin as "preposterous", saying he had "defected from the Catholic faith" on the issue.

"Rudy's preposterous position is compounded by the fact that he professes to be a Catholic," Bishop Tobin wrote. "As Catholics, we are called, indeed required to be pro-life, to cherish and protect human life as a precious gift of God from the moment of conception until the time of natural death. As a leader, as a public official, Rudy Giuliani has a special obligation in that regard."

Read this entire article here:


Stem cells 'created from teeth'


stem cells from teeth

Japanese scientists say they have created human stem cells from tissue taken from the discarded wisdom teeth of a 10-year-old girl.

The researchers say their work suggests that wisdom teeth could be a suitable alternative to human embryos as a source for therapeutic stem cells.

Research involving stem cells is seen as having the potential to treat many life-threatening diseases.

But some people believe using human embryos is ethically controversial.

The researchers, based at the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), say it will be at least five years before their findings result in practical medical applications.

Finish reading this at: BBC



Did my Son's message not tug at your heart?

Did you ever wonder?

He came down from Heaven and took your sins on Himself!

Don't kill His Children!

Jesus in the Garden

Jesus on the cross


Other Great Links at Bible Probe

Figure the Odds
Over 300 Prophecies Jesus Fulfilled

Near Death Experiences

Real Miracles and Angel Visits

Real Angel Visit to a Muslim in Iran

Read Muhammad, Terrorist of Prophet?

The Exodus Happened
See Chariot Wheels found in the Red Sea


Murdering tools preferred by abortionists

Syringe with Spinal Needle to poison