- Islam, Hindu Shintos and all other
faiths can come anywhere close to Christianity vis-a-vis
prophecies that have come true. The Creator
God in His wisdom has made taken out all stops to
ensure the righteous find Him. It is without
saying that the righteous will always look and the
wicked will not.
-
-
Unbelievers
should be aware that the fact that Jesus was crucified
on a wooden cross (Cicero
said; "arbor infelix", or unhappy tree) is just another of the fantastic
"coincidences" (see:
over
300 prophecies Jesus fulfilled) which when taken
in totality - no honest man could say; Jesus is not
the Messiah/the Son of God.
-
-
Psalm 22:16 (written: 1018 BC (Before
Christ) "For dogs have compassed me: the
assembly of the wicked have enclosed me: they pierced my hands and my
feet." What really makes this fulfilled prophecy something
is the fact that when it was written crucifixtion
(and nailing of hands & feet) would be unknown
for another 800-900 years when the Romans used it
against slaves. Is this the actual Titulus
(sign indicating his identity and the reason for his condemnation)
that hung on the Saviors' Cross?
About this ancient find
- two experts, Professor Thiede and
Professor Roll, consider this a major indication of the authenticity of the
titulus. First of all, a variation of Joh. 19,19 is a freedom no forger would
ever risk. But it makes sense, since Pontius Pilatus, who, according to the
gospels, dictated the inscription, was a Roman magistrate and used, especially
for official documents, the official language Latin. It was up to the writer to
create a version in the other two languages, and therefore it was rather
unlikely that he transferred the term "Nazarinus" in the correct Greek form. The
abbreviation of the name "Iesous/Iesus" as "I." is typical for Roman Latin
inscriptions. Since "Yeshu/Yehoshua" was a common name during the 1st century
-Flavius Josephus mentions 16 persons with this name-, the unique "Nazarinus"
rather pointed to the Savior from a small village in Galilee, at least for a
Roman magistrate, although such an abbreviation in contrast to John 19,19 would
be unthinkable for a Christian forger.
History:
In the year 326 the mother of Constantine, Helena, then about 80 years old,
having journeyed to Jerusalem, undertook to rid the Holy Sepulchre of the mound
of earth heaped upon and around it, and to destroy the pagan buildings that
profaned its site, Some revelations which she had received gave her confidence
that she would discover the Saviour's Tomb and His Cross. The work was carried
on diligently, with the co-operation of St. Macarius, bishop of the city. The
Jews had hidden the Cross in a ditch or well, and covered it over with stones,
so that the faithful might not come and venerate it. Only a chosen few among the
Jews knew the exact spot where it had been hidden, and one of them, named Judas,
touched by Divine inspiration, pointed it out to the excavators, for which act
he was highly praised by St. Helena. Judas afterwards became a Christian saint, and is
honoured under the name of Cyriacus. During the excavation three crosses were
found, but because the titulus was detached from the Cross of Christ,
there was no means of identifying it. Following an inspiration from on high,
Macarius caused the three crosses to be carried, one after the other, to the
bedside of a worthy woman who was at the point of death. The touch of the other
two was of no avail; but on touching that upon which Christ had died the woman
got suddenly well again. From a letter of St. Paulinus to Severus inserted in
the Breviary of Paris it would appear that St. Helena. herself had sought by
means of a miracle to
discover which was the True Cross and that she caused a man already dead and
buried to be carried to the spot, whereupon, by contact with the third cross, he
came to life. From yet another tradition, related by St.Ambrose, it would seem
that the titulus, or inscription, had remained fastened to the Cross.
After the happy discovery, St. Helena and Constantine erected a magnificent
basilica over the Holy Sepulchre, and that is the reason why the church bore the
name of St. Constantinus. The precise spot of the finding was covered by the
atrium of the basilica, and there the Cross was set up in an oratory, as appears
in the restoration executed by de Vogüé. When this noble basilica had been
destroyed by the infidels, Arculfus, in the seventh century, enumerated four
buildings upon the Holy Places around Golgotha, and one of them was the "Church
of the Invention" or "of the Finding". This church was attributed by him and by
topographers of later times to Constantine. The Frankish monks of Mount Olivet,
writing to Leo III, style it St. Constantinus. Perhaps the oratory built by
Constantine suffered less at the hands of the Persians than the other buildings,
and so could still retain the name and style of Martyrium
Constantinianum. (See De Rossi, Bull. d' arch. crist., 1865, 88.)
A portion of the True Cross remained at Jerusalem enclosed in a silver
reliquary; the remainder, with the nails, must have been sent to Constantine,
and it must have been this second portion that he caused to be enclosed in the
statue of himself which was set on a porphyry column in the Forum at
Constantinople; Socrates, the historian, relates that this statue was to make
the city impregnable. One of the nails was fastened to the emperor's helmet, and
one to his horse's bridle, bringing to pass, according to many of the Fathers,
what had been written by Zacharias the Prophet: "In that day that which is upon
the bridle of the horse shall be holy to the Lord" (Zach., xiv, 20). Another of
the nails was used later in the Iron Crown of Lombardy preserved in the treasury
of the cathedral of Monza. The early Christian historian Eusebius in his "Life of
Constantine", describing the work of excavating and building on the site of the
Holy Sepulchre, does not speak of the True Cross. In the story of a journey to
Jerusalem made in 333 (Itinerarium Burdigalense) the various tombs and the
basilica of Constantine are referred to, but no mention is made of the True
Cross. The earliest reference to it is in the "Catecheses" of St. Cyril of
Jerusalem (P. G., XXXIII, 468, 686, 776) written in the year 348, or at least
twenty years after the supposed discovery.
|